A contractual term restricting your activities after termination is void for being in restraint of trade and contrary to public policy unless your employer can show that they have a legitimate proprietary interest that it is appropriate to protect and the protection sought is no more than is reasonable having regard to the interests of the parties and the public interest. An employer cannot impose a covenant merely to stop someone competing, but it can seek to stop that person using or damaging something which legitimately belongs to it. This type of restriction is to be distinguished from the duty of confidentiality that an employee owes to an employer. There can be no guarantee that any restrictive covenant will be enforceable and there are no general guidelines which can be specified as to what would be considered reasonable, for example in terms of time or geography. Each clause must be considered in each case by reference to the business needs of the employer imposing the restriction.
If you require information or a consultation call us now on 0800 046 3065.
Back to Employee Services >
HELP WITH...
Employment law for employees
Settlement Agreements
Contracts of employment
Discrimination at Work
Redundancy
Restrictive covenants
Whistleblowing
Dismissal
Disciplinary and Grievance Hearings
Bullying and Harassment
Bonuses and Bonus Disputes
Employment law for employers
Employer Insurance
Employment contracts and policies
All aspects of unfair dismissal claims
Changes to terms and conditions of employment
Discrimination and equal pay
Redundancy (collective and business reorganisations)
Managing sickness absence
Misconduct issues
Employment disputes
Restrictive covenants
Executive appointment
Severance issues / Compromise Agreements
Agency workers
Self employed contractors
TUPE
Recruitment